Verhasselt: The bias stops here
January 19, 2012
Last week I wrote an article
describing what events were taking place at this year’s Consumer
Electronics Show in Las Vegas, and more specifically I was talking
about a surge in the a segment of the notebook computer market, now
known as ultrabooks.
I received a few comments on that
article; one commenter specifically called me out on every point of
the article. I simply couldn’t figure out why they felt so
passionate about the topic. Why did it matter that they were right
and I was wrong? We were just talking about computers after
all.
I’ve come to a three possible
answers for this question. The first, I was wrong. After all, who
am I? An undergraduate at Iowa State, somewhat naive at times, and
still inexperienced in the huge world around me. Of course I could
easily be wrong.
Because in this article I took a
shot at the Apple iPad, the second option, which goes hand in hand
with the third, is that I called it a trend. In another article I
even explained how the majority of users are “doing it wrong,”
hence my favoring these new “ultrabooks.”
These shots hit a few people where
it hurts most: their pocket book. There’s nothing more
disappointing than someone telling you that the purchase you made
is the wrong one. In fact, this is so much that marketing
departments in companies around the world spend billions of dollars
every year convincing you to not only buy their products but, after
you buy them, to make sure you feel good about the
decision.
Because after all, who wants to be
told that their decision was wrong, uncool or unwise. And that
brings me to that third point, people become so protective of their
decisions that it creates a bias.
This bias extends not only to their
future purchase decisions, but to their rationalization and can
even affect their social life in general. You may have heard this
referred to as “fanboy”-ism, but in my opinion, it’s a bias. And
it’s getting rather annoying.
Bias is all around us: Ford vs.
Chevrolet, Apple vs. PC, PS3 vs Xbox. There comes a point when
carrying on a conversation with friends and colleagues with what
started as an innocent conversation over various subjects turns
into a heated debate over one issue or another. “I’d never buy a
Ford.” Well why not? “Because they suck!”
It’s all fun and games when it’s a
product or a food or something that doesn’t really have any
consequence to the people around you, but when bias gets dragged
into the larger issues involving politics, religion and other
philosophies, it becomes enraging.
I’m about to generalize, but have
you ever heard an extremist Christian or an extremist atheist
argue? (Note that I’m talking about the extreme varieties, rather
than the entirety of either group.) Or political commentators on
Fox News/CNN/MSNBC? They don’t listen to the other’s point of view.
How can you have an objective conversation about each other’s
philosophical views without listening to the other’s points of
view?
I’ve heard many say that you’ll
never be able to change another person’s point of view through a
debate or speech and that’s exactly right. It can’t be done because
each side is typically too stubborn to declare their ignorance or
concede defeat.
Personally, I love the fact that
when it comes to the big issue questions such as how the universe
was created, I am truly ignorant. I wasn’t there, I don’t know how
it happened, and quite frankly neither were you. So let’s both use
that to our advantage: We don’t know what happened, but let’s share
our ideas as to what could have happened and see where it takes
us.
It seems that the older we become,
the more entrenched into our viewpoints we become. Watch the news,
listen to people argue, and you’ll soon see that rarely do these
conversations go anywhere.
So with this 2012 election quickly
approaching, I not only suggest, but I beg of you: Try to be open
minded, talk to your friends, and don’t be afraid to be wrong.
You’ll quickly find that being humble in declaring ignorance will
get you farther than being a stubborn jackass.