Admittedly, there are few advantages to getting older, but sometimes it pays to have the perspective age offers. Specifically, I’m talking about my years of experience teaching in the Ames schools, beginning in 1972 — history that eludes younger educators and residents.

When I began teaching in 1972, we had nine elementary schools in the Ames public school system, plus Wilson building for special needs, two junior highs and one high school. Thirteen schools.

In the 70s and 80s, the Ames Public Schools had an exceptional reputation and were highly regarded throughout the nation. Regrettably, we are no longer ranked quite as highly.

One major reason we were able to have such an enviable school system — with 13 buildings — was a vertical curriculum structure in which teachers of every subject — math, art, science, english, music, physical education, etc. — met every month with the other K-12 teachers in their subject area, year after year.

These monthly subject-area meetings articulated program needs, equipment needs, budget needs — to form a cohesive, supportive and logical K-12 program in each specific discipline. This structure enabled dialogue and continuity. The rapport and support was very rewarding, and the subject-area was the stronger for it.

I repeat: Teachers were superbly able to collaborate, when we had nine elementary schools, two junior highs, a special needs school and a high school.

Having six elementary schools will, no doubt, improve the quality of education for children. And, quality education ought to be the driving purpose of the school system.

I know today’s teachers are just as committed as we were, in developing a strong K-12 curriculum that is consistent across the grade levels. A vibrant, effective school system can absolutely be possible with six elementary schools, one middle school and one high school.