LETTER: Alcoholism does not excuse behavior

I find it hard to understand those who believe Coach Eustachy should be allowed a “second chance.” His actions were deplorable and brought considerable embarrassment to this institution, which is universally agreed upon. This embarrassment promises to affect fund-raising, which is unfortunate in light of such serious budget cuts.

Eustachy’s admitted alcoholism certainly merits sympathy; however, it was only admitted in light of the scandal his behavior has caused. I find it hard to believe he would admit such a problem had he not been threatened with the loss of a rather profitable and prestigious career.

Alcoholism is a serious problem, one that I have seen my father struggle with for years. Most of the time those who fight it lose. Coach Eustachy and his family, then, deserve our sympathy and support.

However, his alcoholism — admitted only by force — does not excuse his behavior. The morality clause in his contract does not say, “You shall act in accordance with your responsibilities … except, of course, when you find yourself addicted to alcohol, making passes at women half your age and generally acting like an incompetent, middle-aged prick.” Legally, there is no room for a second chance. Personal issues like alcoholism do not excuse behavior, only explain it.

Coach Eustachy should be fired. He has failed as a role model, as a public figure and as a coach. Termination would not only be the logical consequence for his behavior but would force him to seriously focus on his addiction and give him the time that focus deserves.

Kimberly A. Hoffer

Senior

Secondary English Education