Friday’s editorial seemed to be searching for reasons to cast doubt on the parking plan. It posed questions intended to provide ample evidence to portray the proposed plan as “unnecessary.” Let’s look at those questions.

“Why do 65 percent of students drive to campus?”

Because they want a car on campus. That doesn’t necessarily mean that they drive them every day. The question by itself misinterprets key information provided by Capt. Doug Houghton of DPS. 65 percent of students bring a car to campus every year. In no way does it mean that every day, 65 percent of students get in their cars and drive to class. Many students do use CyRide now and will use it more once it does go free for all routes. While we can hope that the fare-free CyRide will dilute the demand for additional parking, there is a significant need to expand now.

Another question asked, why make those who need to drive pay more so other “lazy” students can be as convenient as they want to be? Any student, faculty or staff member who will bring a car to campus will pay more. That is everyone. Furthermore, the closer to campus you park, the more you will pay. That is as fair as it can get.

As for myself, having weighed all aspects of the plan, I think that the students are getting a great deal. While the price may be a bit hard to swallow, nonetheless it meets the needs of the students and with the additional funding from the Athletic Department, it is a great deal.

For those who agree or disagree with my opinion or that of the editorial board, I invite all students to come to the GSB Senate meeting this Wednesday at 7 p.m. in the Campanile Room of the Memorial Union and make your feelings known to your representatives in GSB.

Anthony Luken

Junior

Philosophy

GSB Senator, Liberal Arts and Sciences