Letters to the editor: Dioxin or not, let’s find out for sure

Bekah Gable

WhileÿIÿagreeÿtheÿstudyÿdenouncingÿAmes’ÿelectricÿpowerÿplantÿshouldÿbeÿreplacedÿbyÿoneÿwhereÿresearchÿincludesÿVISITINGÿtheÿplant,ÿandÿnotÿusingÿjustÿaÿscientificÿmodel.

Iÿbelieveÿtheÿplantÿshouldÿbeÿwillingÿtoÿprovideÿevidenceÿthatÿitÿisÿnotÿproducingÿtheÿdioxins inÿquestion.ÿÿ

Scientificÿresearchÿfromÿ1981ÿwouldÿhaveÿtoÿbeÿcross-referencedÿagainstÿmoreÿrecent informationÿforÿsomethingÿasÿmundaneÿasÿaÿclassÿproject.

Whyÿshouldÿresearchÿsoÿcriticalÿtoÿhumanÿhealthÿbeÿacceptedÿwithoutÿquestionÿinÿ2000?ÿ

Justÿbecauseÿ”theÿstateÿDNRÿ(DepartmentÿofÿNaturalÿResources) … [isn’t]ÿquestioningÿit”ÿdoesÿNOTÿmeanÿthatÿtheÿcommunityÿwillÿacceptÿoutdatedÿinformation.

BekahÿGable

Juniorÿ

Mechanicalÿengineering