The new group of GSB senators wasted little time in embedding themselves in the controversy left over from their predecessors.

With the turning down of Jeremy Williams as the new finance director the new group of senators has raised many questions as to why they voted as they did.

It seems as though many of the senators are more interested in flexing their power than handling the issue at hand, while the rest are so new to the job that they may simply be voting the way that everyone else does.

What is the problem with approving Jeremy Williams? Does he have serious b.o. or something? Has he seriously offended someone? Or is he just overqualified?

Why did certain senators change their vote? Did they find out their friends voted differently and they wanted to vote similarly?

Are some senators still upset that Adam Gold’s finance director nominee was turned down? Is the GSB Senate like the Borg, a collective group of people with only one vote? Or is it a group of individuals that think, act and vote individually?

Why won’t certain senators comment on why they changed their vote? Are they ashamed? Can’t they defend their own position?

Why does GSB play so many games about such simple issues? Are some senators trying to make things difficult? Do other senators feel that their job is to cause confusion? Is Jeremy Williams qualified to be finance director? Definitely. Does he deserve the chance to do the best job he can? Absolutely. Will the new Senate give him that chance? Who knows?

There is a lot of craziness going on in GSB these days, and just think, there is still a whole year left to put up with it. Somehow GSB needs to get down to some real business and stop playing games with everyone, because in the end they will only be playing with themselves.