In 1994, Navy Lt. Paul Thomasson confessed to four of his commanders that he was gay.

The military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t pursue,” policy was tested at that moment, and two years later, the courts don’t even want to hear about it.

On Monday, our nation’s Supreme Court ruled that the bearings of this case, one of the more controversial issues of this decade, wasn’t suitable enough to consider.

Thomasson’s argument was that his discharge was unconstitutional. The court is recognizing the Clinton administration’s policy and therefore doesn’t care about Thomasson’s pleas.

What this situation should be is another chance. Another chance for the courts to determine if the law is fair.

Another chance for the Clinton administration to analyze its view.

Another chance for homosexuals in the military to serve their country — openly and honestly.

If soldiers can’t be honest with either their peers or themselves, it could erode the very foundation of honor on which they base their service.

While the military is employed to preserve the rights and freedoms of every individual in this country, it seems ironic that within its own walls, it doesn’t practice what it preaches.

Is it the Clinton administration’s responsibility to determine if a soldier is fit to serve based on sexual orientation? No.

Is it a court’s responsibility to determine if soldiers, gay or straight, have the ability to enter into battle, fight and even die for their country? No.

If people undergo the rigors of training to become soldiers and succeed, they should be allowed to serve their country. Proudly.

No one should stand in the way of someone’s dreams. And the military above all, should fight to preserve this idea.