Defending our daughters and granddaughters
April 24, 2023
The passage of Title IX shepherded a new generation of opportunities, equality and fairness for female athletes nationwide. Since its codification in 1972, female participation in athletics – at both the high school and collegiate levels – has skyrocketed.
According to the National Collegiate Athletics Association, fewer than 30,000 college athletes were women in 1972, and now, over 50 years later, more than 218,000 college athletes are women. High school athletics also experienced the same growth. Based on calculations by the National Federation of State High School Associations, more than 3.4 million American girls play high school sports today, roughly a 1,000% increase from the 300,000 girls who played high school sports in 1972.
Regrettably, the progress we’ve made the last five decades could all be reversed if President Joe Biden has his way. Earlier this month, the Biden Administration proposed a new rule through the Department of Education that would expand the scope of Title IX, allowing transgender athletes to compete against biological women and girls. It would also federalize this issue, forcing states like Iowa – where we uplift our female athletes – to comply with President Biden’s ridiculous, unscientific mandates. This charade completely dismisses the millions of American women and girls who have set records, competed at the highest levels and smashed through the glass ceiling because of their hard work, dedication and commitment.
Fortunately, House Republicans stepped up to the plate this week and passed our Protection of Women and Girls Sports Act, which requires school athletic programs – that receive taxpayer dollars – to fully comply with Title IX protections for women and girls, including recognizing individuals’ gender at birth for athletic purposes. At its core, this important legislation preserves fairness in sports and defends our daughters and granddaughters from shameful attempts to destroy their opportunities and diminish their achievements. Just like Governor Kim Reynolds’ decisive work to protect women’s sports in Iowa, I am proud to join my Republican colleagues at the federal level to protect women and girls in every sport in every community across our country.
For Iowans, it is common sense that men should compete against men and women should compete against women in sports. Sadly, this concept is lost on many of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle in Congress. As a father of two daughters who have played high school sports, I will continue to advocate for fairness and opportunity for all women and girls and ensure that they can compete on a level playing field. They deserve nothing less.
We are a government together, and your thoughts and opinions matter to me. Please contact my office at Feenstra.House.Gov or by phone at 202-225-4426 if I can ever be of assistance. I am proud to represent our families, farmers, main street businesses and rural communities in Congress.
Sarah C | May 2, 2023 at 9:01 am
As a cis woman who was an an athlete in school, I didn’t need to be “protected” from my transgender sisters competing alongside or against me. Trans girls are real girls, trans boys are real boys and all of us deserve to be welcomed for who we are. Also, the assumption that trans girls would automatically outmatch cis girls shows the sexism of this argument.
David Jackson | May 2, 2023 at 6:07 pm
Repeating the slogans and platitudes one is told to think is not a replacement for thinking for oneself and making arguments based on facts, nor is it a befitting someone attending an institution of science and technology.
The sexism of this argument? You need to look up the performance differences between females and male to female transgender athletes’ muscle mass, bone structure, bone density, and lung capacities, let alone height and weight advantages and then form a conclusion. Only people who dogmatically form conclusions before ignoring the available data (instead of analyzing that data) call their opposition names instead of arguing logically on the basis of the facts.
David Jackson | Apr 27, 2023 at 8:33 pm
To the commenters claiming this is “anti-trans, hateful rhetoric” or this politician only represents “some” people. Biological facts aren’t hateful, but emotional political ideology certainly is.
Ian | Apr 26, 2023 at 10:23 am
Anti-trans, hateful rhetoric plain and simple. The amount of transgender female athletes is an immensely small percentage and cases of them winning or dominating. When someone goes on puberty blockers or hormones it’s changing many aspects of their body and actively hinders their ability to compete in sports. This is just another issue like gay marriage that is to distract from the economic issues which representatives like Randy are failing at.
Nicole P | Apr 25, 2023 at 12:13 pm
I appreciate Randy’s statement, “I am proud to represent our families, farmers, main street businesses and rural communities in Congress.” Those groups in the 4th district include people who are transgender and people who care about them. I suggest he be more specific about which families, farmers, businesses and rural community members he’s really representing. Changing “our” to “some” would be a starting point.
Nuke | Apr 25, 2023 at 8:46 am
Is this paid advertising? How is it that Feenstra is being platformed weekly on his pet issues with absolutely ZERO counterpoint from The Daily staff?
Lucas Ramey | Apr 25, 2023 at 2:44 pm
Hey Nuke, you seem to be pretty active in commenting and offering different opinions on mine and some other columnists work. Which is important, but why don’t you write an opinion piece in response?
Sherri L Paul | Apr 27, 2023 at 9:28 am
Lucas, I think you are missing Nuke’s point. I think the publishers could do better, by offering readers a counter-point opinion from the other party.
.
Lucas Ramey | Apr 27, 2023 at 5:13 pm
Hi Sherri, I don’t think I am. I was in Nuke’s spot at one point and its the reason I decided to write for the daily. I felt my side could get some better representation so I took it upon myself to do that. This isn’t always the case, but it might be that no one is interested in writing a response. In this case, Nuke(or someone else) should volunteer to write a guest column.
David Jackson | Apr 27, 2023 at 8:20 pm
I think you missed Ramey’s point, why don’t you or Nuke write one?