Lisowski: Christianity in college
April 19, 2023
Today, Christianity is broad and comes in many shapes and sizes. From small, local churches to large congregations now referred to as megachurches. What these churches have in common is generally the same in what they teach, but how they do it and what kind of audience they attract is quite different.
The most common denominations I have run into are either Lutheran, Presbyterian, Methodist or Catholic. They all worship Christ and agree on who He is, and what He did for us. He was born of the Virgin Mary, died for our sins, rose from the dead, ascended into heaven and will return again.
I grew up in a small Catholic Church. I was baptized when I was a baby, attended many youth nights, became confirmed in high school and took Holy Communion more times than I can count. I took part in traditions and sacraments at my church where I furthered my relationship with God and what he means to me, surrounded by other members who were, for the most part, much older than I was.
These traditions seemed normal to me until I grew older and met people whose beliefs were similar, but who didn’t necessarily receive communion weekly, or sit between pews – kneeling during certain prayers. Instead, they were people who grew their faith in God in a church much more modern and youthful.
These people found their faith in a Baptist megachurch. The most commonly known, in Ames, is Cornerstone Church. The church has hundreds if not thousands of members. It is multi-generational and college students seem to be at the forefront of their membership. What Cornerstone Church has over other more traditional churches is the ability to appeal to younger audiences.
That is why its membership is so great.
The music that is performed there, the youthfulness of its members and the more casual sermons that are both meaningful and relatable are all reasons for its success. The hard truth is that most students in college don’t want to attend a more traditional church. To young adults, they are seen as boring or lackluster.
Newer churches, like Cornerstone Church, capitalize on it, grabbing the attention of our demographic by providing us with a strong sense of community and even entertainment.
While it’s not my cup of tea, it’s heartwarming to see more and more students that are giving God a chance. To see people who are willing to devote their lives to Christianity is inspiring for our generation.
I also recognize that religions are complex, and there are so many denominations, but it’s pretty common nowadays to see students proud of sharing that they’re part of a Church, and I wanted to highlight how impressive that is.
With all the bad in the world, it’s encouraging to see that Christianity still has its place on college campuses.
R Lisowski | Apr 25, 2023 at 7:49 am
I do believe the article was written from the perspective of, it is a positive to see young individuals seeking out their faith. I do not believe this article was meant to cover the history of religion(s) and all it’s difficulties which could include persecution, dogma, theology, falability, indoctrination, etc. Be happy for those who feel connected to a community and even a potential Savior if you so choose and believe. One may say it is better to have optimism than pessimism or regret.
Nuke | Apr 21, 2023 at 9:00 am
As a recovering Catholic who has experienced community in faith, I respect the author’s outlook. But without a hard, honest look at the historical harm that Christianity has wrought on American society (e.g. the practice of slavery as divine right of one group of people to subjugate others), I have little faith that Christianity can repair its harms. Indeed, there are few voices in the Christian world that are more dominant than those who refuse to acknowledge the wide-ranging harms, including the way they continue to manifest in certain systems. Instead, the most visible representatives of Christianity (and, I would argue, corrosive to the message of Jesus) relentlessly attack historical scholarship (e.g. the manufactured outrage over CRT and its supposed use in public primary schools). The question should become: Can my religion be deemed a part of the solution to the evils of an exploitative society; or is it merely a tool wielded by those in power so they can continue to subjugate even the most devout?
To have a complex relationship with my Catholic upbringing is not such a bad thing; in fact, it has added to my spiritual life. Yet people on this forum will likely attack me for my nuanced view on the topic, or for my secular humanistic approach to the world. To them I would ask: why such a strong reaction? What’s the harm in questioning Christian indoctrination?
David Jackson | Apr 25, 2023 at 9:04 pm
The truly awesome part of this is, you’re not joking.
Slavery has at some point (and in some cases still) existed everywhere in the world, under nearly every culture, religion, and lack of religion. What evidence do you have that Christianity, as a religion, is responsible for chattel slavery in the US? I can’t wait for this one.
You can follow that up with evidence of the US being an exploitative society….now or even ever, relative to any other society at the same point in history.
Critical Race Theory (CRT) is Marxist exploitation theory reapplied from economic class to personal identity. Shocker parents of many religions take issue with modern ideologues rebranding the failed 20th century moralizing emotional slogans, which resulted in authoritarian communist governments inflicting so much tyranny and death it was the one political ideology which managed to murder more innocent people than the fascists, so they can exploit a new century’s gullible into voting authoritarians into power yet again. Yeah, it’s all just living in denial of “historical scholarship” and couldn’t possibly be because they’re not gullible enough to be suckers for the same shameless emotional sloganeering which insulates CRT proponents from analyzing their own rhetoric on the bases of facts and evidence or anything.
When moralizing rhetoric is more important to someone than evidence, you’ll stop believing in God and/or objective truth, and instead start believing in anything that promises social license to feel moral. CRT does this, as just the latest rebrand of the godless political cult that is Marxism, whose sermonizing tells you if you believe in it you get to feel morally and intellectually superior to anyone who doesn’t based on the self-righteous groupthink alone. By the time the emotional and naïve realize they were used as outrage mobs to put charlatan authoritarians into power, it’s too late, as their power now consist of controlling we the people’s speech, weapons, property, and liberty to the point there’s nothing the people can do about it anyway.
But hey, why not when you get to temporarily indulge in the dopamine rushes of hedonism, and feel self-righteous because you’re media consumption told you that you are compared to people who believe in a power higher than human bureaucracy, and that humans are by nature flawed, and that asking God for forgiveness is the key to a truly righteous life.
There’s no harm in questioning indoctrination at all. There’s plenty of harm in lacking the introspection to only see it in the other tribe. A thinker with nuance would recognize that.
David Jackson | Apr 26, 2023 at 7:58 pm
The truly awesome part of this is, you’re not joking.
Slavery has at some point (and in some cases still) existed everywhere in the world, under nearly every culture, religion, and lack of religion. What evidence do you have that Christianity, as a religion, is responsible for chattel slavery in the US? I can’t wait for this one.
You can follow that up with evidence of the US being an exploitative society….now or even ever, relative to any other society at the same point in history.
There’s nothing wrong with questioning indoctrination, there’s something wrong with being so indoctrinated by your chosen narrative you only see it in the other tribe. A nuanced perspective view would see that.
Critical Race Theory (CRT) is rebranded Marxist exploitation theory reapplied from economic class to personal identity. Shocker parents of many religions take issue with modern ideologues rebranding the failed 20th century moralizing emotional slogans, which resulted in authoritarian communist governments inflicting so much tyranny and death it was the one political ideology which managed to murder more of their own people through genocide than even the fascists, so they can exploit a new century’s gullible into voting authoritarians into power yet again. It’s not living in denial of “historical scholarship” it’s that they’re not naive enough to be suckers for the same shameless emotional sloganeering which insulates CRT proponents and other post-modernists from analyzing their own rhetoric on the bases of facts and evidence. Yet, this concern is painted as a Christian attack on historical scholarship? Not remotely.
But hey, why not believe there is no God when you get to temporarily indulge in the dopamine rushes of hedonism, and feel self-righteous because you’re media consumption told you that you are compared to people who believe in a power higher than human bureaucracy, and that humans are by nature flawed, and that asking God for forgiveness is the key to a truly righteous life.
That’s actually the issue with not believing in God, the delusion that humanity is the ultimate authority and as such social consensus is more important than objective truth, insulating people from seeking truth when safety in numbers is so much more comfortable. Moralizing rhetoric becomes more important to someone than evidence, and instead of believing in objective truth, you’ll start believing in anything that promises social license to feel moral. CRT does this, as just the latest rebrand of the godless political cult that is Marxism, whose sermonizing tells you if you believe in it you get to feel morally and intellectually superior to anyone who doesn’t based on self-righteous groupthink alone. By the time the emotional and immature realize they were used as outrage mobs to put charlatan authoritarians into power, it’s too late, as the centralized government’s power now consists of controlling we the people’s speech, weapons, property, and liberty to the point there’s nothing the people can do about it. This is why both the international socialists, and the national socialists, were anti-religion. Authoritarians can’t have people believing in something more powerful than the ruling political class, or they start to question the ruling political class and could rebel.
Greta | Apr 20, 2023 at 3:20 pm
If it leads to the students having discriminatory or superior attitudes toward their gay or Muslim peers, it really is not that encouraging or “heartwarming”
David Jackson | Apr 25, 2023 at 9:08 pm
What’s the average atheist attitude towards that Christian peer? Or the Muslim’s attitude towards the gay peer? If you really care about how people treat each other, it’s worth thinking about.